🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to reinitiate atomic talks with the United States on condition that it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi stated solely negotiations worked, and shared recent overtures had come from mediators to resume negotiations with the Trump administration. He said Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran could not yet allow the global atomic watchdog to access attacked atomic facilities for safety concerns.

Navigating a Challenging Path

Araghchi is treading a challenging course since Iran does not want be perceived to be acting from a stance of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged stronger defensively and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Previous Negotiations Abruptly Terminated

The earlier sessions of discussions between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter end on 12 June when Israel, with US support, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with the US president asserting the facilities had been obliterated. Subsequently, European countries employed their right to reimpose international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Magic Solution Offered

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to assert triumph since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could operate inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Diplomats stated three times they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Status

Tehran representatives said the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the offer could be reintroduced in certain ways if talks resume.

The US president last week said he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to resume discussions, but privately Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from the United States either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of inactivity in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran asserts negotiations is not part of a performance.

Political Stance

In his remarks to the conference, aimed to portray the US as a dominant force that abuses the notion of global regulations, the foreign minister said the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the conflict could not be resolved by armed force. He asserted the strikes commenced with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with total Washington understanding and coordination, making trust difficult to restore.

Diplomacy Remains the Final Resolution

The foreign minister declared: "Tehran was not the one that had fled dialogue; it was America and the western countries that had consistently attempted to dictate their will during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be active and remains the final solution to resolve conflicts, but its standards, rules and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"If they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of dignity and respect, they will obtain a response in the same language."

Repair and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the conflict of restoration and recovery, Araghchi said he was certain Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We acquired numerous insights from this war; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the opponent."

He continued: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to obliterate, continues to exist. The sites and equipment, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is essential is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but failed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have become stronger, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the government and the country in the wake of this invasion."